Polyester is the world’s most widely used textile fiber, accounting for more than half of all global fiber consumption. It’s found in everything from fast fashion and activewear to home furnishings and industrial products. Behind its widespread use lies a complex manufacturing system praised for its cost-efficiency—but scrutinized for its environmental and ethical costs.

So, what are the problems with polyester production?The main issues include high fossil fuel consumption, toxic chemical use, air and water pollution, intensive energy requirements, and labor-related health risks. These impacts challenge sustainability goals and demand closer scrutiny from B2B buyers in the textile supply chain.

And yet, despite this controversy, polyester remains essential in global commerce. So how do we reconcile its performance advantages with its production challenges? In this article, we’ll dissect each critical issue step-by-step, using data, case studies, and supply chain insights to help buyers and brands make more informed sourcing decisions.

1. What Environmental Challenges Arise from Polyester Manufacturing?

Polyester manufacturing causes significant environmental harm due to non-renewable resource extraction, greenhouse gas emissions, and synthetic waste that is non-biodegradable and persists in ecosystems for hundreds of years.

Understanding the Full Scope of Polyester’s Environmental Impact

a) Non-Renewable Raw Material Extraction

Polyester is made from PET (polyethylene terephthalate), a thermoplastic polymer derived from petroleum. Its two main raw materials:

• PTA (Purified Terephthalic Acid)
• MEG (Monoethylene Glycol) are both products of crude oil and natural gas refinement.

The production of polyester contributes directly to the extraction of over 70 million barrels of oil annually, according to Textile Exchange.

b) Carbon Emissions from Polymerization

Polymerization of PTA and MEG into PET is highly energy-intensive:

• Releases \~5.5 kg of CO₂ per kg of polyester produced
• Emissions mostly occur during melt spinning and filament drawing

c) Landfill Impact and Non-Biodegradability

Polyester fibers can persist in landfills for up to 400–500 years. With fast fashion trends driving more frequent disposal of clothing, most polyester-based products are incinerated or buried after minimal use.

• Less than 1% of polyester textiles are recycled back into new fiber.
• Blended fabrics (poly-cotton, poly-elastane) are even harder to reclaim.

d) Case Example: The Fast Fashion Footprint

A typical fast fashion brand launches 52 micro-collections per year, with many polyester-based items worn fewer than 10 times. These garments are:

• Cheap to produce
• Easy to print and pack
• Hard to biodegrade or recycle

Result: Polyester accounts for more than 60% of global clothing landfill waste according to the Ellen MacArthur Foundation.

2. How Is Polyester Production Linked to Fossil Fuel Dependency?

Polyester is fundamentally a fossil fuel-based fiber, heavily reliant on petroleum and natural gas. Its entire supply chain—from raw material extraction to finished filament—is tied to oil infrastructure, making it incompatible with long-term renewable goals.

Polyester’s Oil-Based Supply Chain

a) Polyester Starts with Crude Oil

The building blocks of polyester come from oil refineries:

• Paraxylene (PX) → purified into PTA
• Ethylene → processed into MEG

This process not only relies on fossil fuel inputs, but also shares infrastructure with other carbon-heavy sectors like plastic packaging and synthetic rubber.

b) Global Production Hotspots Near Oil Hubs

Polyester manufacturing is often co-located with petrochemical clusters:

• China (Zhejiang, Jiangsu) – Near PX and PTA plants
• India (Reliance, Hazira) – Fully integrated with crude refining
• Saudi Arabia, USA – Growing synthetic fiber arms within oil majors

This integration makes polyester cheap and scalable, but also locked into fossil fuel economics.

c) Limited Transition to Renewables

Unlike natural fibers like cotton or hemp, which are grown, polyester cannot be produced without fossil fuel inputs—unless using:

• Bio-based alternatives (e.g., Bio-PET)
• Recycled plastics (rPET)

However, these solutions make up less than 20% of current polyester production.

d) Bio-Based Polyester at Commercial Scale

Coca-Cola’s “PlantBottle” technology uses 30% plant-based MEG, showing that partial fossil fuel replacement is viable in packaging. However, adoption in fiber production is slower, due to:

• Technical challenges in PET spinning
• Cost constraints for fashion brands

3. Do Polyester Factories Cause Air and Water Pollution in Manufacturing Zones?

Yes, polyester factories are a major source of localized air and water pollution, especially in developing regions where dyeing, finishing, and chemical processing discharge untreated or minimally treated waste into the environment.

How Pollution Happens Throughout the Polyester Value Chain

a) Air Pollution from Melt Spinning and Finishing

Polyester fiber production involves melt spinning, which generates:

• VOCs (Volatile Organic Compounds) like acetaldehyde and formaldehyde
• Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) from high-temperature emissions

In unregulated areas, fumes are vented directly into the air without proper filtration, creating smog and health risks in nearby communities.

b) Water Pollution from Dyeing and Finishing

Dyeing polyester requires high temperatures and disperse dyes, many of which:

• Are carcinogenic or contain heavy metals
• Do not bind easily, leading to higher dye runoff
• Enter local rivers and groundwater systems

In poorly treated facilities, dye effluents are discharged into rivers like:

• Citarum River, Indonesia (Asia’s most polluted waterway)
• Ganges River, India (home to multiple polyester finishing units)

c) Groundwater and Soil Contamination

Contaminated dye water seeps into the soil, affecting:

• Local farming (vegetable crops show heavy metal uptake)
• Well water (high incidence of skin rashes and gastrointestinal illness in villagers)

d) Dye Pollution in Xintang, China

Xintang is known as the “Jeans Capital of the World,” but it’s also home to many polyester dyeing mills. Greenpeace tested local water bodies and found:

• High levels of cadmium, lead, and antimony
• A sharp rise in cancer rates among nearby communities over a 10-year span

4. Is Polyester Production Energy-Intensive Compared to Other Fibers?

Yes, polyester production is significantly more energy-intensive than most natural fibers. The heat required for polymerization, spinning, and dyeing consumes large amounts of electricity and steam—mostly generated from fossil fuels in major producing countries.

Energy Profiles of Textile Fibers

a) Polymerization and Melt Spinning Are Power-Hungry

To produce polyester fiber:

• PTA and MEG must be heated to over 260°C
• The melt is then extruded through spinnerets to form filaments
• These filaments are cooled, drawn, textured, and heat-set

Each step adds to total energy use, which averages:

• 125–150 megajoules (MJ) per kilogram of polyester

b) Energy Source Matters

In countries like China and India, over 60% of electricity used in textile zones still comes from coal-fired power plants. This results in higher Scope 2 emissions for polyester compared to renewable-powered mills.

c) Dyeing Polyester Requires More Heat Than Cotton

Polyester dyeing uses disperse dyes, which need to be applied at 130–140°C using high-pressure jets—unlike cotton dyeing, which can be done at \~60°C.

d) Carbon Footprint Comparison

According to the Higg Materials Sustainability Index:

• Polyester scores \~4.4 kg CO₂e per kg of fiber
• Organic cotton scores \~2.0 kg CO₂e
• rPET scores \~2.3–2.7 kg CO₂e

This means switching from virgin polyester to either organic cotton or rPET can cut fiber-level emissions by nearly 50%.

e) Renewable Integration in Thailand

Indorama Ventures in Thailand implemented biomass boilers and solar panel arrays in one of its PET fiber plants. As a result:

• Reduced fossil-based energy use by 23%
• Earned bluesign® certification
• Attracted premium orders from sustainability-focused clients in Japan and Europe

5. What Toxic Chemicals Are Used in Polyester Processing and Dyeing?

Polyester processing and dyeing involve several hazardous chemicals, including antimony compounds, disperse dyes, and solvents. These substances can harm both factory workers and surrounding ecosystems when not properly managed.

Chemical Risks in the Polyester Lifecycle

a) Antimony Trioxide – The Hidden Catalyst

• Used as a catalyst in the PET polymerization process
• Classified as a possible carcinogen (Group 2B) by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC)
• Found in trace residues in polyester garments

Although the amounts are small in finished fabric, repeated exposure in production zones poses serious occupational health risks.

b) Disperse Dyes – A Persistent Pollutant

• Specifically designed for hydrophobic fibers like polyester
• Poor fixation rates (up to 30% dye is washed out during dyeing)
• Can contain azo compounds or chlorinated aromatics—some are mutagenic or allergenic

c) Surfactants and Carriers

In high-temperature dyeing, carriers are used to increase dye penetration. These include:

• Phenol derivatives
• Chlorobenzenes
• Alkylphenol ethoxylates (APEOs) – banned in EU due to endocrine disruption

d) Global Chemical Regulations Are Inconsistent

While Europe enforces REACH standards, many producing countries—especially those with lower compliance costs—lack equivalent controls.

e) Dye Water Contamination in Dhaka

In a polyester processing zone outside Dhaka, Bangladesh, textile dye house effluents tested positive for:

• Disperse Blue 56, a suspected carcinogen
• Heavy metals like chromium and copper Despite national regulations, enforcement was weak due to local corruption and lack of technical infrastructure.

6. Are Workers Exposed to Health Risks During Polyester Fabric Manufacturing?

Yes, polyester manufacturing poses serious health risks to factory workers, including chemical inhalation, skin contact allergies, heat stress, and exposure to dust and microplastics—especially in poorly ventilated and under-regulated facilities.

Human Risks in the Global Polyester Supply Chain

a) Chemical Inhalation

• Workers near polymer melt lines or dyeing machines inhale VOCs and formaldehyde fumes
• Prolonged exposure linked to:
  • Headaches
  • Lung irritation
  • Chronic respiratory conditions

b) Skin Allergies and Dermatitis

• Disperse dyes and surfactants frequently cause allergic reactions, especially in workers without proper protective equipment
• PPE (personal protective equipment) is often unavailable or ignored in Tier 3 factories

c) Heat Stress and Exhaustion

• Dyeing polyester at 130–140°C generates intense ambient heat
• In non-air-conditioned plants in South Asia, internal temperatures can exceed 45°C
• Result: Dehydration, heatstroke, reduced productivity

d) Dust and Microfiber Inhalation

• Cutting and handling polyester yarns releases fine microfiber particles
• Workers may inhale these particles, which can accumulate in the lungs and lead to respiratory distress or fibrosis

e) Lack of Regulation and Training

• Many factories in developing countries do not conduct occupational health audits
• Workers often lack:
  • Hazard training
  • Proper PPE (masks, gloves, aprons)
  • Medical monitoring

f) Worker Incident in Gujarat, India

In 2022, a polyester yarn plant in Gujarat reported:

• 17 cases of respiratory illness among workers in a non-ventilated dye house
• No PPE usage and improper chemical storage
• Local NGO intervention led to fines—but no long-term systemic change

7. Which Global Regions Face the Most Pressure from Polyester Production?

The regions under the greatest pressure from polyester production include China, India, Bangladesh, Vietnam, and Indonesia—where weak environmental regulations, high production volumes, and low-cost labor converge. These countries bear the brunt of the industry’s pollution and social impact.

Geographical Hotspots of Polyester-Related Burden

a) China: The Giant with Tightening Controls

• World’s largest polyester producer
• Regions like Zhejiang, Jiangsu, and Fujian are home to:
  • PTA plants
  • Spinning mills
  • Dye houses

Recent progress:

• Government-enforced closures of non-compliant mills
• Expansion of bluesign® and OEKO-TEX certifications in export zones

Remaining issues:

• Smaller mills in Tier 3 cities still discharge untreated effluents
• High dependency on coal-powered electricity

b) India: Fragmented Regulation, High Output

• Polyester plants are concentrated in Gujarat, Tamil Nadu, and Maharashtra
• Dyeing and finishing clusters often operate in informal sectors
• Water pollution from dyeing in Tiruppur has damaged agriculture and fisheries

c) Bangladesh, Vietnam, Indonesia: Apparel-Centric Risk Zones

While these countries import polyester yarn for garment production, they face:

• Dye wastewater mismanagement
• Poor factory ventilation and safety
• Lack of chemical compliance monitoring

Bangladesh, for example, lacks a central wastewater treatment system for many textile zones in Gazipur and Narayanganj.

d) Social Consequences

• Cancer clusters near dye facilities in China and India
• Worker illness and unrecorded fatalities
• River contamination affecting drinking water and crops

8. How Can B2B Textile Buyers Address These Issues Through Smarter Sourcing?

B2B buyers can address polyester’s environmental and ethical challenges by partnering with certified suppliers, choosing recycled or low-impact polyester options, and incorporating transparency and compliance into procurement decisions.

Practical Sourcing Strategies for Responsible Buyers

a) Prioritize Certified Suppliers

Choose suppliers who offer:

• GRS-certified recycled polyester
• OEKO-TEX® Standard 100 for chemical safety
• bluesign® approved facilities for cleaner production

b) Request Sustainability Documentation

Ask your suppliers for:

• MSDS (Material Safety Data Sheets)
• Water treatment system details
• Emission and energy usage reports
• Worker safety audit summaries

This builds traceability and lowers compliance risk in export markets (e.g., EU Ecodesign Regulation, U.S. CBP Withhold Release Orders).

c) Choose Better Materials

• Opt for rPET over virgin polyester
• Use mono-material designs for recyclability
• Avoid multi-fiber blends that hinder end-of-life reuse

d) Use Third-Party Verification Tools

Leverage platforms like:

• Higg Index: Environmental footprint comparison
• ZDHC Gateway: Chemical management traceability
• TextileGenesis: Blockchain-enabled fiber tracking

e) EU Brand Shifts to Certified Polyester

A medium-sized German apparel brand switched from generic polyester to GRS-certified rPET from a bluesign®-approved supplier in China:

• Reduced CO₂ footprint by 36%
• Qualified for EU Green Claims pilot program
• Reported 22% increase in B2B retailer inquiries due to verified sustainability claims

Polyester Isn’t Going Away—But It Can Be Rethought

Polyester production brings undeniable environmental and human costs—but responsible sourcing, innovation, and smarter B2B practices can dramatically reduce the damage.

Buyers and brands don’t need to eliminate polyester entirely. Instead, they must ask better questions, choose the right partners, and prioritize accountability at every step—from fiber extrusion to garment finishing.

The future of polyester is not just about fiber chemistry. It’s about business ethics, cleaner technology, and global cooperation.

Want to Source Low-Impact, Custom Polyester Fabrics with Confidence?

SzoneierFabrics is a professional polyester manufacturer offering:

• 100% Quality Assurance
• GRS and OEKO-TEX Certified Options
• Custom Yarn Types: FDY, DTY, Staple, rPET
• Low MOQ (starting at 300 meters) & Fast Sampling
• Export-ready documentation & sustainability reports

Whether you’re a fashion label, industrial supplier, or wholesale apparel brand—we help you create better products, responsibly.